Data quality asks
- Is the field populated?
- Is the value in the expected format?
- Does the record meet a threshold or rule?
- How many defects are visible?
Specialist data and control integrity advisory
DQIntegrity helps regulated organisations prove that decision-critical data is complete, correct, traceable and controlled—from source to outcome.
Conventional data-quality reporting can show whether individual fields meet rules. It does not necessarily prove that the right population arrived, transformations preserved meaning, controls operated, exceptions were resolved or decision outputs can be reconstructed.
Why DQIntegrity exists
Data can pass field-level quality rules and still be incomplete, duplicated, mapped incorrectly, transformed without traceability or omitted from a downstream decision process.
Control architecture
The framework can be applied to financial crime, payments, reporting, migration, AI-dependent processes and other decision-critical environments.
Expected population, ownership and permitted use.
Transfer, ingestion, sequencing and timeliness.
Mapping, enrichment, derivation and version control.
Which process, rule, model or decision used the data.
Reconciliation, correctness and exception detection.
Proof of operation, traceability and accountability.
Resolution, root cause and sustainable improvement.
Commercial services
Identify structural gaps across data journeys, controls, evidence and ownership.
Explore →Assess whether monitoring, screening and KYC processes receive complete and correct data.
Explore →Design population, value, mapping, correctness and exception controls across the journey.
Explore →Provenance, permitted use, versioning, monitoring and human accountability.
Explore →Priority environments
Completeness and correctness across source systems, data layers, scenarios, alerts and investigation outcomes.
Transaction monitoring →Transaction populations, value preservation, transformations, testing, cutover and operational reconciliation.
Banking applications →Aggregation, lineage, ownership, evidence and decision-usefulness aligned to BCBS 239 and supervisory expectations.
BCBS 239 readiness →Data availability, restore integrity, provider dependencies and evidence across critical services.
DORA data resilience →Training, reference and synthetic-data lineage; controlled transformations; drift and exception evidence.
AI assurance →Proportionate control improvement for CEE, SEE and Western Balkan institutions modernising data and regulation.
Regional banking →Brand architecture
The intended corporate and commercial architecture for specialist propositions and engagements.
Senior advisory across financial crime, data and control integrity, payments and operational resilience.
Explore NFRisk →Focused depth in end-to-end data and control integrity, evidence and assurance.
If the data fails, the decision fails.
A confidential first discussion can establish whether the issue needs a focused diagnostic, control design, remediation support or retained specialist advisory.